A corporate IVC - internal value center (or internal service
center as it is sometimes called) is also sort if a business within a business,
albeit of a fundamentally different nature compared to a regional branch or
retail outlet.
The latter satisfy the needs of your clients and consumers
by providing them with your products while your IVC satisfies the needs of your
SBU, functional units, regional branches, retail outlets and individual employees
by providing them with products and services that they need.
The fundamental attribute of an IVC that it occupies a distinct location (distinct from
corporate headquarters or any other premises). Examples are training facility,
data center, manufacturing plant, auto garage, warehouse, service center, and a
distribution hub. And many others.
Traditional financial management paradigm distinguishes
between profit centers and cost centers. Which is quite misleading
and not actually useful, because shareholders who pay the salaries and bonuses
of employees of both profit and cost centers, are not really concerned about
profits or costs per se.
They are concerned about free cash flows and financial
value; and to create it you need both ‘profit’ and ‘cost’ center. This
distinction is even harmful, because it creates and illusion that the former
are somehow superior to the latter, which offends employees of ‘cost centers’ and
lowers their productivity. Which, in turn, immediately and negatively affects
the amount of financial value generated by the company for its shareholders.
In reality, there are no ‘profit’ or ‘cost’ centers. There
are only value centers that participate
in value-generating corporate projects and processes. If the center is not
involved in any of these processes, it has no right to exist in the corporate
structure at all. Period.
The fundamental objective of IVC analysis is to choose between
placing (or keeping) this center in-house or outsourcing it. Naturally, from the financial value perspective. Which
requires development of a comprehensive financial
model by a highly competent financial analyst. The model supported by all necessary
corporate documentation.
Actually, you almost always have this choice – with both ‘cost’
centers (IT or accounting services, transportation, logistic, personnel
training, etc.) and ‘profit’ centers (franchising or enlisting the services of
a distributor, dealer, exporter or retailer).
If you see that the outsourcing option is clearly superior
to the in-house option, you must obviously go with it. Establishing the harmonious relationship with your new
supplier. If you see that the
in-house option is superior (or comes very close), you will need to thoroughly
analyze your IVC to maximize its aggregate performance.
You analyze IVC almost
as you would analyze any other business (or an SBU, for that matter). ‘Almost’
because there is a fundamental difference between IVC and the ‘normal’
business. The latter sells its products at market
prices, while the former ‘sells’ them at internal or so called ‘transfer’
prices.
Which must be determined very thoroughly and competently to
accurately reflect true economics of IVC-related internal transactions. Hence,
you will need the services of a very competent transfer pricing professional.
Obviously, your corporate objects map for your IVC is much
more limited than the one for the ‘normal’ business. IVC has its own history, strategic
objectives and plans (which need to be closely coordinated with corporate ones),
its own risk management system, stakeholders (strictly internal), projects, processes,
tools, obviously a functional organizational chart and personnel.
In addition, it has its own UVP, core competencies and
competitive advantages (over the outsourcing option). Everything else is
provided by headquarters (at their
transfer prices).
No comments:
Post a Comment