Management (or managerial) accounting is a somewhat
artificial discipline. When it was conceived (it was many decades ago when
business management was nowhere as complex as it is nowadays), it was supposed
to become an internal (‘management’) counterpart to external financial
accounting that cater to ‘external’ investors.
Foundations of management accounting were developed during
the ‘old times’ where managers were mostly concerned about managing costs. They did need financial statements – to speak the
same language with their shareholders, but of a slightly different nature.
Shareholders needed financial statements delivered by financial accounting to make investment decisions while managers
needed financial statements delivered by management
accounting to make management decisions.
Which at that time mostly dealt with cost
management decisions.
As the result, ‘traditional’ management accounting mostly
covers developing financial statements (modified from their GAAP/IFRS ‘parents’)
and using various cost management methodologies to develop the corresponding reports
that are supposed to help managers make optimal decisions and execute them in
the most efficient ways.
Well, for better or worse, but those ‘good old times’ are
long gone. Nowadays, corporate managers need a whole lot more information (actually,
knowledge) to radically improve both
quality of their decisions and the efficiency of their execution. And knowledge
about the right cost allocation is only a small part of this ‘whole lot’. In fact, most
of this ‘lot’ is not even financial.
Therefore, it makes little sense to analyze your ‘traditional’
management accounting function. What needs to be analyzed, is development of
the comprehensive corporate knowledge base that corporate managers need to do
their jobs well. Which must include all
knowledge – financial and non-financial (operational).
No comments:
Post a Comment